Photo Contest Reply: Tyson
Fick replied to my letter with understanding and a goodly amount of
reasonableness, all things considered. Good for him:
Hi Mr. Dixon,
Thank you for your email...
I’m... sorry to hear of your disappointment with the contest rules. I want to
assure you that I am not trying to scam anyone or be deceitful. Nor is it my
intention to disallow someone from selling marketable photos that might be
entered in the contest. We are no strangers to paying for photography services
and every year we spend a lot of money on photography and photo usage rights
with a number of professional photographers. We will continue to spend a lot of
money on photography and video going forward with or without a photo contest.
But, you rightly pointed out that this is more of an amateur photo contest and
we don’t expect many if any professional photographers will enter. And it is
true that we are looking for a way of expanding the library of usable images
while engaging with people around Alaska. We have run contests like this in the
past and this language was suggested by our copyright attorney.
I’ve been directed by my
board to get unlimited usage rights on newly purchased photos since the
patchwork of usage agreements and promotion partners had gotten pretty unmanageable.
Maybe we can do a better job on the contest rules language so that ASMI can use
and share the photos without further permission or expense while the
photographer retains copyright and the ability to sell images elsewhere and
would be happy for a suggestion while we take look at amending the language.
I’m happy to talk about it
any time. If you want to call, my number is below.
Best fishes,
Tyson Fick
Communications Director
Alaska Seafood Marketing
Institute
and my reply in turn:
I appreciate your prompt
and thoughtful reply. I'm glad you understand the issue, and I appreciate that
you continue as an organization to purchase photos. I think your suggestion of
improving the contest language so photographers don't give up all their rights
to the images is the right direction to head. Crediting the usage back to the
photographer is always a good policy as well. At least that way something is
given back to those who are providing you with images that would encourage
their interest in the craft (who doesn't like to see their name in print?), and
doesn't divest them of ownership of their own images. That way the entrant can
be part of the solution instead of a victim. It's a more palatable agreement,
at least in my mind. I hope your lawyers agree.
Best,
Hopefully ASMI will change its language on the rules (and its policies) to be more favorable to photographers in the future. At least we got them thinking about it...
No comments:
Post a Comment